Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (64644)	3/18/2007 6:56:35 PM
From: Webster Groves	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

<However, i say , not so, not for humankind> But eternal war exists only when the war is not totally devastating, but rather tolerable. Such is the current situation, and the rachet could be cranked up a bit and still be less of a concern than who the next American idol might be. As the true believers fight and die for their cause, those remaining are presumably "less believing". Furthermore, if the true believers die young with no progeny to mourn them, no thirst for revenge transcends generations. All this gives hope that the waste of the current war will eventually end, not when Bush is gone, but when the people are sophisticated enough to react with reason rather than emotion. We certainly are not there yet, and perhaps 4 mores years of war are needed to rid us of our thirst, but I believe (for I am also a true beliver) that the war will end; we will lose; and things will be worse than they are now for America (sorry to say). wg