To: tyc:> who wrote (36297 ) 3/19/2007 2:22:19 PM From: marcos Respond to of 78419 wkm.v - friday's little starter-upper was on thin trading, hard to trust, this morning's moderate resumption is not particularly thick either, so who's to say, but it does look like maybe the sub-.40s dumping has slacked off ... it'll probably happen again of course, perhaps in the .70s vit.v - fizzled again, no news yet ... oh well, tuesday is a better morning for that anyway In re 'time-decayers', i prefer the term to the w-word you use, as it connotes a degree of the risk involved, which is desirable imho because they do not come with any warranty ... if/when their underlying corrects, as all parabolically curved charts must do at some point, the bid for such efforts can virtually disappear, poof ... your money, you ask? - well, somebody else has it now That said, i have now bought the time-decayers of which you speak in each of four weeks running, started 23feb at .52 if memory serves, this morning's were at .83, got a real bundle of them at this point ... as for 'cheap', well that's a relative thing, imho they are cheap compared to what they'll go for in the foreseeable future ... not likely to offer any under the 1.25 this page says they were worth friday, anyway - canadianwarrants.com But then that being said, they're not the only game in town either ... life goes on all over ... how about lth.v, something gonna happen there one day soon ... or good ole Genco, this little dip won't last long imho - stockcharts.com 'This is the best of all times to be invested, IMHO ' - absolutely, none better ... Claude may end up right, maybe not the year to sell in may and stay away, we haven't had our seasonal green in the normal season so far ... but ya can sniff it in the wind, cantcha