Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (90553)	3/19/2007 4:22:14 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Mark, I watched her testimony and that is not what she said.

To: JBTFD who wrote (90553)	3/19/2007 5:47:34 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

According to the AP story ( news.yahoo.com ) she said "she wasn’t a lawyer and didn’t know what her legal status was.." She wants to get the idea across she was covert within the meaning of the law because she's a partisan Democrat who wants to attack the administration first and foremost, but she did say what I indicated. Armitage has admitted publicly he told Woodward that Plame worked for the CIA on WMD issues. He said it was common knowledge because Wilson was calling people all over Washington and telling them. Woodward confirmed that. And Novak testified early on that Armitage was his source. Therefore Armitage definietely and probably Wilson would be indictable IF the disclosure was a crime. Fitzgerald's failure to indict either Armitage or Wilson shows he knows there was no underlying crime. He got Libby on perjury charges irrelevant to the issue of whether there was an underlying crime.