SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: seti who wrote (228443)3/19/2007 3:23:57 PM
From: Sarmad Y. HermizRespond to of 275872
 
>> assuming the 65nm. yields are very good at Fab36

The person who makes this assumption is ignorant to the point of bliss.



To: seti who wrote (228443)3/19/2007 3:24:55 PM
From: aleph0Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
// I suppose skipping 65nm. and going straight to 45nm. is actually a good sign ... assuming the 65nm. yields are very good at Fab36

It's like the gambler that does a double down to try recouping losses. //

Good sign , in terms of ...
a) Fab36 65nm. yields enough to cover 2007 demand ?
b) confident about 45nm. ?
c) saving capex on the 65nm. equipment

BTW.. I though putting even 65nm. into Fab30(38) would be a problem due to the cieling heights ?
Obviously not !


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News