Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Picks of the quarter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (2841)	3/19/2007 3:43:55 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 20435

sounds good to me. I only have four darts anyway.

To: Elroy who wrote (2841)	3/19/2007 4:10:10 PM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20435

I think you should limit it to 10 not 4 If it is too much work with the trades and you want it about picking stocks and not trading on some silly rules that don't apply in real life, then make it so what you buy you are stuck with. You could let people short so they can make market neutral portfolios if they want... but one portfolio with no changes is fine with me. I'd rather see that rather than a set of complex rules that the one who figures out how to take advantage of the rules wins.

To: Elroy who wrote (2841)	3/20/2007 6:40:35 AM
From: Taro	Respond to of 20435

I agree in principle - to both of your statements ;) Taro

To: Elroy who wrote (2841)	3/20/2007 9:37:11 AM
From: Taro	Respond to of 20435

Fire in Dubai: Your place burning? Taro

To: Elroy who wrote (2841)	3/20/2007 9:45:39 AM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20435

How about max 5 and sell all or none of any single stock? Ted may disagree while that would simplify his transactions but limit his creativity ;) Still agree with your statements but 5 seems to me like a good compromise based on some inputs. Taro