Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ARU.V Aurelian Resources Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: teevee who wrote (350)	3/20/2007 10:01:12 AM
From: FEARLESSF	Respond to of 516

Thats a good one, many of the before mentioned analysts are also fund managers that have bought up very large percentages of ARU. Therefore they have put there money where their mouths are and thus would be held responsible if ARU were to go down through their portfolio loses. Duh. Teevee, perhaps you should go back to extolling the virtues of that pump and dump company VIT. Perhaps you can give the same advice over there that you have been giving on the ARU boards. LOL. F.F.

To: teevee who wrote (350)	3/21/2007 11:28:15 PM
From: russet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 516

What's interesting is back when the strike length was 400 meters so many of the so-called ANALysts were calling for 10 million oz Au. Then when it went to 800 meters it was 20 million oz Au. Of course no one seemed to note we had high grade veins plunging near vertical and drill cores at 45 degrees and lots of space between the veins. One small person said maybe we should divide by at least two and was called all sorts of names. Now with strike lengths at 1.2 km they talk about 10 million oz again. What happened to 10 million oz per 400 meters?