SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (228498)3/20/2007 10:11:30 AM
From: j3pflynnRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
SYH - Perhaps it doesn't for Intel's process and designs. Clearly AMD has a different take. And it's not something you can just plug in or pull out, it affects the entire design.



To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (228498)3/20/2007 11:41:44 AM
From: combjellyRespond to of 275872
 
"I've read several times that Intel claims SOI at 65 nm does not give significant advantage."

They made the same claim at 130nm and 90nm. Now true, thick box, partially depleted SOI has declining advantage with smaller geometries. But there is a difference between "declining advantage" and "no advantage". As far as "significant" goes, it all depends on how you define it.



To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (228498)3/20/2007 11:58:02 AM
From: fastpathguruRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
SOI is just a word to me. I don't know what else it implies. Other than it adds to cost, and it makes it harder to achieve higher frequencies.

What is the reasoning behind the latter assertion re: frequencies?

fpg