SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Koan and Ralph Emerson's Far Right and Far Left Whacked Out -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LoneClone who wrote (46)12/11/2007 7:43:26 PM
From: Proud Deplorable  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103
 
Is it possible that your dog could be a racist?

Some scoff at the idea, but others say canines can learn prejudice against particular races.

By Mekeisha Madden Toby / The Detroit News
Image
Fox

In the "Racist Dawg" episode of "King of the Hill," Hank Hill's dog senses Hank's resentment of having to turn over repairs in his home to a professional, voiced by Bernie Mac, and the dog's hostile reaction is mistaken for racism.

Pet prejudice

Do you think dogs can be racist?

On the latest episode of HBO's "Curb Your Enthusiasm," Larry David and his wife, who are white, purchased a dog. All seemed well until their friend Wanda Sykes came over for a visit. Upon seeing her, the dog went insane, barking wildly at Sykes and trying to bite her.



Sykes, who is African American, said the dog is racist and leaves. Whether the dog is racist and what to do about it was a thread throughout the episode, which aired Sunday.

Just the phrase "racist dogs" sounds like a punch line. In fact, it has been on a few TV shows. In addition to "Curb Your Enthusiasm," "Chappelle's Show" on Comedy Central had a sketch based on the idea. It also was a humorous storyline on an episode of Fox's "King of the Hill."

But for some, the idea is no joke. Type "racist dogs" into Google and what pops up is a whole world of chat rooms arguing about the question: Can dogs be racist?

Of course, plenty of people scoff at the idea. But there are others, including both owners and people who study dogs, who say Rover can be racist.

Central among believers is Nicholas Dodman. He's a veterinarian and director of the animal behavior clinic at the Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University.

"Certain dogs may be only aggressive with certain types of people," says Dodman, author of "Dogs Behaving Badly: An A-Z Guide to Understanding and Curing Behavioral Problems in Dogs" (Bantam, $14). "Some dogs don't like fat people, people with funny hats or men with beards.

"And some dogs don't like black people and are racist."

American culture often looks at racism only as a belief that a particular race is superior to others. But racism also is defined as treating people differently based on how they look. That simpler meaning is more key to the idea that dogs may be capable of racism.

Susie Essman, one of the stars of "Curb Your Enthusiasm" who appears in the racist dog episode, says her own pup prefers Asian people.

"I adopted my dog, who is from Japan, from a rescue shelter," says Essman, who is white.

Her dog Sumo is a 5-year-old Shih-Tzu. "The people at the shelter said he was cuddly but not a licker. And they were right. He cuddled me all the time. And then I brought my boyfriend's daughters over, and they're half Asian, and he practically licked their faces off."

Melissa Laiserin, a PetSmart dog trainer and program development manager for pet training, said clients often ask if their dog is racist. Her answer is always "no."

"Dogs don't work that way," says Laiserin, adding that dogs can be prejudiced against an individual but not a race.

Jeanette Robbins of St. Clair Shores still isn't sure whether dogs can be racist or are just individually biased. Robbins, who is white, had a dog who despised his veterinarian, who was Sikh.

"He took one look at his turban and tried to attack," says Robbins, who eventually gave the dog away. "We had to muzzle him so the doctor could treat him."

But Dodman, the Tufts University veterinarian, doesn't question whether dogs can be racist. He says explaining why dogs might be racist is the same as trying to clarify human racism.

One reason, he says, is a lack of exposure. Dogs should be exposed to all different types of people in the first three to 14 weeks of their lives.

"Whatever a dog is exposed to in that early period is expected and processed as the norm," says Dodman, who has studied animal behavior for 15 years. "That's the period where trust is also built. After about six months, a dog can develop neophobia, or a fear of anything new. What or whoever that new thing or person is can be viewed with mistrust."

But neophobia wouldn't necessarily dismiss all seeming prejudice on a dog's part. Sometimes dogs specifically treat people of an unfamiliar race differently based on negative encounters and associations, Dodman says.

"If a man with a beard abuses a dog as a pup, that pup will grow up to dislike men with beards," Dodman says. "The dog figures that this man was bad, so all men who look like this are bad.

"That association can and does happen with race."

That doesn't mean dogs treating some people differently can't be due to their owner's intent. Dodman says dogs can be taught to hate certain people.

Annette Dukes agrees.

"Dogs don't think white people are good and black people are bad unless someone teaches them that," says Dukes, a property manager who lives in Detroit.

Her own experience with the idea of a racist dog isn't exactly conclusive. A little girl at a home Dukes was visiting told her the household dog, a Great Dane named Cujo, "eats blacks."

Dukes, who is African American, didn't wait around to find out if Cujo was racist. She left.

"I wish I could thank that little girl. She saved my life," Dukes says, only half jokingly. "I'm 5 (foot), 2 (inches tall) and that dog came up to my breasts. I wasn't taking any chances."

Of course you might ask -- couldn't it just be that the little girl was racist or just didn't like Dukes personally? Sure. But Dukes says she took the cautious route based on what she says is historical context for the idea that dogs can be racist.

"Look at the Civil Rights movement and the dogs that were used against (black people)," she says.

The German shepherds who attacked African Americans during civil rights marches is one of the historical incidences some say give credence to the idea of prejudiced dogs, along with the Dobermans sicced on Jewish people during the Holocaust and hounds sent after African Americans who tried to escape during slavery.

Counterarguments place the blame back on humans, not dogs. Dogs were certainly trained by people to attack in those incidents.

And verbal cues aren't required for a human to motivate a dog's actions. Dodman says dogs pick up on the feelings of their owners.

Dr. Grace Chang at Southfield Veterinary Hospital agrees. "Dogs can sense the fear of their owners. So if a person fears people of a certain race, dogs can pick up on that." But, she adds, "Dogs can also attack or growl because they are territorial and protective."

Chang, who has been a dog doc for more than 20 years, doesn't believe dogs can be racist. But she does refute the common belief that dogs are color blind.

"Studies now show dogs can see some color," Chang says. "They can also see black and white and tell the difference between the two.

"I've never had a dog turn on me because of my race. But I'm Chinese, so I don't know how dogs process that."

You can reach Mekeisha Madden Toby at (313) 222-2501 or mmad den@detnews.com.




To: LoneClone who wrote (46)12/15/2007 7:32:50 PM
From: Ron  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 103
 
The huge political mess in the United States is largely a result of the way we finance elections. Special interests run the government. Here's a rant that sums it up:

Don't call it campaign finance any more. It's bribery: Baksheesh, graft, kickbacks, payola, extortion, fraud, slush funds, tribute. The good old USA has taken bribery to institutionalized levels the third world can only dream about.
Individual voters have been shut out of our democracy.

Why? Because money talks and the big money interests now are in a position to contribute far more to politicians than individual registered voters. It is institutionalized bribery,pure and simple.
Want to clean up the electronic voting fraud mess? Try competing with the big companies that funnel huge contributions through 'corporate associates' to parties and politicos, far more than you, Mr or Mrs Registered Voter,can scrape together.
Want to make sure our drugs and food are safe? Try competing with the big companies that produce drugs and food. Under our current system they will get what they want almost every time.
Much ballyhoo was raised over the McCain-Feingold election reform bill as a fixit for this American bribery problem, but it was only a band aid, and still leaves huge loopholes and wide open avenues for special interest groups to contribute dollars to the folks who write the laws of the land, and the Commander-in-Chief.

Think about this for a moment. Why on God's green earth, should multinational corporations, labor unions, the American Medical Association, The Trial Lawyers Association, Goldman Sachs, or the IBEW be allowed to contribute money to candidates and political campaigns? They are not human beings. They can't vote. So why are they allowed to donate money?

Shouldn't only individual voters be allowed to contribute to politicians and political campaigns, with reasonable limits imposed?
Why do our politicians spend millions of dollars getting elected? To raise money for political ads? Why do they have to pay for political ads? Why don't TV and Radio stations donate a reasonable amount of airtime to allow candidates to explain themselves to the voters? This is common in many other countries, but not the U.S. One reason may be the influence of the broadcasters and publishers, who make huge amounts of money (billions) off political ads.
Some have attacked efforts to reduce campaign contributions as an attack on freedom of speech. But since when does money equate with speech? Give me a million dollars to pass around and give him a good speech to deliver, and I will attract more interest with the money than he will with his speech. Money and speech are two different things. The big money interests run this country, not the voters. Our republic has been hijacked.
There has been much hand-wringing over voter apathy in recent years, but not so much honest coverage of the reasons.
First and foremost is the common attitude among citizens that elected politicians do not truly represent them any longer, so voting is a waste of time.
Some way to run a 'democracy' eh?
Want to make a difference? Raise hell. Support election reform initiatives. Exercise your right as a citizen. Look for groups like Common Cause that actually want honest and open government. And by all means, hold your nose, and vote. Every now and then a truly honest, sincere politician gets elected. It is the only alternative we have to tyranny.
opensecrets.org