Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (224951)	3/21/2007 11:19:21 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

It's not just socialists, or even mainly socialists, who want world wide regulation. Are you under the impression that even a majority (or even a significant minority) of the world's concerned scientists (wrt this issue) are socialists who are sad they've lost the world wide bandwagon of socialism (somehow connected to the fall of communism)? If you are asserting this, could you back it up with some facts. So far I've seen zip on the facts front. You've got plenty of strange theories, but do you have any numbers? For all you want to say about the global warming folks, at least they've got some numbers. You can argue about their numbers, but so far I've got nothing like hard evidence from you. I fail to see how the fall of communism could depress socialists- who are a different class of political creature, and who didn't really have a huge investment in the USSR, and further, how you get from THERE to thinking they have anything much to do with the global warming debate. Let me guess- Gore is really a homeless East German, despondent over the fall of communism, and looking to promote the terror of global environmental regulations. There are probably WMD somewhere in this story, aren't there? Weapons of meteorological destruction, that is.