Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hank2010 who wrote (36509)	3/21/2007 11:08:56 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

Well, it is all subjective. I go by these boys from time to time too, but you gotta watch it. A bit of data does not a mine make and all moss covered ground not drilled is not barren. I know several prospects that have as good or better characteristics than the Spanish, and much more consistency and better provenance of data. The res geos signed off on the MIDB which is the list of all showings in Ontario. They hemmed and hawed about what constituted a showing and finally settled on 16,000 separate occurences of all metals. There are 5,000 drilled off or otherwise sampled copper-zinc occurrences and 10,000 iron deposits of varying kinds. In one township in Ontario there are recorded 12,000 gold showings. Kirkland Lake area has about 6,000 occurrences of gold in prospecting reports. I don't think 16,000 quite cuts it. But that is what the res geo's say. EC<:-}