Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mindy1968 who wrote (61310)	3/22/2007 9:21:34 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197215

I would suggest that you read the Q brief that I linked to rkral. It's only 155 pages long. Those are big questions you ask that deserve proper answers but I don't have the time to devote to doing so. And not being an expert on the ITC's jurisdiction, I could get it wrong. The language you quote is advocacy, i.e., Q's side of the story. It's good, credible advocacy as far as I can tell, but still is language designed to get the ITC to look at things Q's way. For what it's worth, I don't think handsets using infringing DO chipsets are going to be excluded, but I don't have a clue as to what remedy will issue.