Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (90932)	3/22/2007 5:29:48 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

I make no speculation and the logic is straight forward. why was Libby stupid enough to lie under oath? People don't lie when they have nothing to hide. He may not have. In one charge, the jury was charged with believing either Libby or Russert re. a conversation on a certain date. They decided Libby was lying and Russert was telling the truth. It could have been the other way round or more likely one or both simply misremembered. Perjury charges are easy to get. He should have said he didn't remember to every question. When Vernon Jordan was questioned about what if anything Clinton had told him about the Lewinsky scandal, Jordan had trouble remembering anything. He was likely lying about that but was safe legally.