SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (329973)3/22/2007 7:26:17 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575426
 
Yeah, I guess we would have a choice of moving goods (like food), going to work, or fighting wars. It's not just the Gulf, it's also Russia and Venezuela.

It wouldn't be a choice between broad categories of activities. It would be higher prices for all of them.

As for an embargo of all of OPEC and Russia, I don't see it as being at all likely. They would harm themselves by doing so, and Iraq and Kuwait, and to at least a limited extent the rest of the Gulf States, rely on our military protection and deterrence.

As for not seeing any problem with paying a lot for oil imports. Of course its a problem. Its an expense that hits across the whole economy, and a fairly big one. But its less of a problem than most proposed solutions.



To: Road Walker who wrote (329973)3/25/2007 1:54:57 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575426
 
Have you notice on the GOP is like a one or two trick pony? About three weeks ago, they dusted off and made public once again the mantra that it aids the enemy to protest the war. Of course, it didn't work.....just as it didn't work the times its been used in the past. So, its been quietly put back on the shelf.