SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (329980)3/22/2007 7:31:03 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1587979
 
Well, I'm glad you finally agree that Congress can hold investigations.

They always can hold investigations. Whether they are are useful, useless, or even negative, is another issue.

Executive privilege?

The president himself, and any of his advisers that don't have to be confirmed, can not easily be forced to testify under oath by congress. Traditionally they don't testify under oath in front of congress. Now the president can waive this privilege, and such waiving of the privilege if far from unknown. Most often it is done when serious credible accusations of illegal activity have been made. One famous case was when Ford waived the privilege to testify under oath about his pardon of Nixon.



To: Road Walker who wrote (329980)3/22/2007 9:11:58 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1587979
 
Aren't this whiny Republicans a hoot! They had almost EVERY Clinonista before Congress, testifying under oath, and then had Clinton testifying under oath. Apparently, a different standard applies to THEM, in their minds..