SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rkral who wrote (61357)3/22/2007 10:14:49 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 197253
 
!!!!!
Indirectly it seems like the equivalent of a finding of infringement.

Yes, which reminds me...I owe Art an apology. He called this correctly a few weeks ago when I had been assuming that the jury's finding of non-infringement would stand.

Nice call Art. I was clearly wrong....

Slacker



To: rkral who wrote (61357)3/23/2007 7:40:51 AM
From: JeffreyHF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197253
 
When the potential remedies are argued on May 2, don`t be surprised to find Carol Lam presenting the Qualcomm position, provided she has a good rapport with Rudi Brewster.If he opts to let Qualcomm participate in the Patent Pool, Qualcomm may opt not to appeal, so as to not risk making bad law by appellate adoption of Brewster`s liability ruling.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News