Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (29296)	3/23/2007 7:24:54 PM
From: dijaexyahoo	Respond to of 42834

math noted: <<Now Honey is chiming in: "Chgo...what is QQQuestionable is the fact that allancoleman basically keeps calling the host of these threads a liar by refusing to accept his word that he has seen proof that it was Bob Brinker posting as "donlane/mistertopes.">> --Honey, if I said I had ironclad proof that Brinker was NOT don lane, would you accept that as truth? Of course you wouldn't. So why would you expect allan to accept what kirk said as truth? math said; <<The basic assumption on 101 seems to be that all differences of opinion are lies.>> --That is a basic assumption of the bashers on ALL the boards, not just 101. -:) Also, all errors are lies, as fake-fahrenheit just showed us once again. Of course, another thing they do is make ridiculous charges against people, then refuse to answer questions about those charges. Like this: kirk said to math: <<No, you are not arrogant, just pathetic like a Moonie who denies the obvious and hangs on to harassing Brinker's critics for nearly decade now.>> --Asked to give some examples of math "denying the obvious," kirk did the obvious and stonewalled. Of course, he CAN'T answer because what he said is not true. Kirk simply made it up, and when challenged, he stonewalled. Which is what they always do.