Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (2935)	3/23/2007 2:34:22 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

yeah anna Nicole Smith, I can't get enough of that crap. Or they could go back to Scott Peterson, A year of that every freaking night just wasn't enough

To: John Carragher who wrote (2935)	3/23/2007 2:49:05 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

He cannot accept she enjoys campaigns! it could be a great distraction for her, takes her out of her self and worry about the cancer because she gets so into the process of his running for president. Even I don't believe she really enjoys campaigns. Who besides Bill Clinton would? But forget the issue of whether she enjoys campaigns, more importantly her 5 and 8 year old have a limited time to spend with their mother and she with them in this world. I don't think she will waste that time flying to Sioux City. why doesn't he say no man or woman ,, i am talking healthy ones should run for president.. if they have young children. it takes them away from home too much, they miss pta meetings, school plays, going over their homework at home, attending church activities. etc etc.... Hmm, well I wouldn't go that far but I personally wouldn't take a job that took me away from young kids. I've recently turned down opportunities to travel and work overseas with my company (with a $$ premium) so I can see my grandkids every day.