Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JGoren who wrote (61433)	3/24/2007 9:18:20 AM
From: limtex	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 197254

JG - she also did not ask to be on the email list. But the lawyers should have found them. It was a core issue, Best, L

To: JGoren who wrote (61433)	3/24/2007 12:11:40 PM
From: Qgent	Respond to of 197254

I respectfully disagree with Carranza's take that the emails were intentionally hidden by counsel. The lady testified that she didn't read them; therefore, when she searched for emails she wasn't looking for everything at the time of discovery. Then when things get serious and she is preparing for trial, she goes back and finds them. Here is her court testimony on the email subject less than one week after Qualcomm's counsel represented to the Court at side bar on January 18, 2007, that “there’s no evidence that any e-mail was actually sent to this list. Q Did you receive mailings from the ad hoc committee identified in this exhibit? A During the preparation for this testimony, there were some e-mails pulled out of my e-mail box. E-mail archive. Q Were they produced to Broadcom? A I don't know. Q All right. But during the preparation for your testimony in this case, emails to you as a result of your being on this list were pulled out of your e-mail box, correct? A Yes. (Trial Tr., 53, Jan. 24, 2007). Someone pulled these from her email archives, and it's a grave error that: 1. Qualcomm's counsel didn't disclose them, while knowing about them. 2. Who ever pulled them didn't notify counsel. or 3. the least likely, counsel forgot about them. Take your pick. Either way someone screwed up. That testimony after a side bar saying there was no evidence, on one of the last days of the trial, certainly didn't help the home team. Someone's head needs to roll for this one. Respectfully, Qgent