Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: peterk who wrote (61437)	3/24/2007 12:19:00 PM
From: limtex	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197244

Pt - This is a court and is no different to a casino. Anything can happen and as we have seen anything is happening. The point is that Q could end this nonsense in a second if it said that it had eliminated the need for this patented item. And would disable it for all imports of existing inventory. Q has the greatest R&D dept on the industry and it is being made to look idiotic. We are entitled to ask what on earth they are doing at Q HQ. This is not just a bad dream it is happening. Every time Q walks into a court these days it and we get a nasty shock. Q's legal prowess was supposed to be a strength. It has turned out to be a paper tiger and a total embarrasment. It is very sad to see IJ humiliated like this. And we are entitled to expect the R&D dept to do something, anything to engineer Q's way out of this. Where are they? Yuo believe in rational logical decisions by courts? Good luck to you. Best, L