Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (61451)	3/24/2007 3:25:20 PM
From: Qgent	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197271

Qcom wins 2 vs Nokia. Anyone have a complete list of Nokia's Defenses handy? Are these 2 the first to go, leaving 11 more? Did Nokia's unclean hands defense have to do with timely disclosures to the SSO? On January 17,2007, complainant Qualcomm moved for summary determination as to respondents’ twelfth (unclean hands) and thirteenth (patent misuse) affirmative defenses. On February 20,2007, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting complainant’s motion. On February 27,2007, the respondents petitioned for review, and on March 6, the Commission Investigative Attorney and complainant Qualcomm filed briefs in opposition to the respondents’ petition. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. edisweb.usitc.gov A little bit of good news, no stall/review for Nokia. Qgent