Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (330276)	3/28/2007 8:52:58 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575844

Going after someone who is innocent of wrongdoing but belongs to a different party may not be obstruction of justice but its not the kind of justice system I want in this country. Its not the type of justice system I want either. OTOH I don't think it close to being clear that the person in question was innocent of any wrongdoing. If the situation was reversed and in an unclear or disputed situation, the prosecutor was going to go ahead, and then was fired to prevent the prosecution, you could claim obstruction of justice. As it stands it just looks more like a disagreement over what can and should be prosecuted. Should the prosecution have happened? I don't know. I don't you or anyone else here does either, even if you think you do. We all know the different opinions put forth by the people involved and various comentators, but few, perhaps none of us, know any of the details of the case.