Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tommy Hicks who wrote (98793)	3/25/2007 9:28:48 PM
From: Patchie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

I don't know Tommy I am not sure what a claim of a maybe 6% short interest over 18 months means; 4.8 Million over 62 Million eclipsing 18 months is not exactly a substantial sum. Would you buy based on such a short interest? Can you prove that the 4.8 million short interest is fictional? I am not so sure that the reports presented to date refute his numbers. Do you have such data? As we have seen by FOIA data, companies with problems are the ones most abused by teh industry. The company creates victims and the markets create more victims. Apparently you are one that thinks the additional victim base is acceptable since the company was already creating some. I am interested in your own analysis that would refute the numbers provided by Buyins.net since I do not follow the company personally. Oh, and if guilt by association is your forte, take a close look at Goldman Sachs who recently got nailed for allowing clients to naked short. Extrapolate that out and our markets are in real trouble.