SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougSF30 who wrote (228962)3/26/2007 12:54:40 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Doug,

They claimed that from the start, but that is a pathetic metric to satisfy. (as opposed to the same % of good die).

Well, I said "at least", or >=. If they said that from the start (and were correct), they we should now be well into the ">" area.

Joe



To: dougSF30 who wrote (228962)3/26/2007 2:12:56 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Joe understated the significant of 100% 65nm starts. There is no longer any bin-split discrepancy between AMD's 65nm process and its 90nm process. AMD must be yielding as many high-end parts from 65nm wafers as it ever did from 90nm wafers.

So you can retire the tired "broken 65nm process" phrase.

Petz


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News