Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougSF30 who wrote (229003)	3/26/2007 5:53:09 PM
From: Rink	Respond to of 275872

Yeah, well, it's not like he never enjoyed exaggerating something before. It's all a question of what makes sense. No strain at all (no DSL, no stress memorization, no other previous technique) just seems a bit over the top. No improved SiGe based strain however might make enough sense. Oh yeah forgot to mention the previous time there was a (Inq I think) story saying that improved strain might come in Q2. Anyway as I explained I think there are other causes too that explain 65nm bin / power combinations we are seeing. So it's not anywhere near certain until there's more evidence. Guess I'll shut up now about this until we get more detail. Regards, Rink

To: dougSF30 who wrote (229003)	3/26/2007 7:54:04 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Well, that wasn't what Elmer was claiming. Elmer doesn't know what he is claiming. He just parrots what someone tells him. But that might be the case, I suppose. That is almost certainly the case....I suppose. THE WATSONYOUTH