Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLNI - Game Over -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (9708)	3/27/2007 8:36:15 AM
From: scion	Respond to of 12518

All good questions Jeff, but the 'inveterate longs' wish you wouldn't ask such simple questions which need only simple answers. They prefer to duck such questions, and prefer to scatter unconnectable dots instead. Keeping the sheep in the shearing pen requires their undivided attention.

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (9708)	3/27/2007 12:59:32 PM
From: shortsinthesand	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12518

Hi Jeff... I couldn't agree more with you! Not only that what Turek has done by promoting a buy back in Many Pr's and personal interviews over the last 18 months while issuing himself shares then selling them has had the same effect as what everyone rants about called naked shorting.. RE:4. Why a CEO who can issue boatloads of free stock to himself would obligate himself to buy back billions of shares? Ummm, hello, anyone home? Think about it Here is a man that put out a PR in August of 2005 claiming he was going to retire 200 Million shares and start aggressively buying back shares! When in fact he sold over 8 billion shares during the next 18 months while screaming he would commence the buy back very soon the whole time.. The price fell from .019 down to where it sits at .0003-4.... Now over on the IHUB board they are claiming he is going to buy back! This is outrageous! this is essentially the same thing that one does when they sell short..... Only Turek had no cost he simply issued shares to himself and then sold them by misleading people that he was buying back. This is naked deception at its best.. Turek is the Naked Shorter because he had no cost to sell his stock!!! Just simply outrageous -ABA