Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Uranium Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TheSlowLane who wrote (9565)	3/27/2007 3:00:13 PM
From: John McCarthy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30199

Hi Paul slow day and I bumped into your post probably NOT what you are after but fyi ezinearticles.com stockinterview.com prweb.com regards, John

To: TheSlowLane who wrote (9565)	3/27/2007 5:23:21 PM
From: AuBug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30199

Fox News? Isn't that the sequel to The X Files ?-) Well stated. After I clicked submit I was afraid you were going to think I was criticizing you. Just generalized commentary on the madness of crowds. The present number of uranium stocks is bewildering. Many will burn up investor's cash and evaporate. A few will go up 100x. I agree, the most insightful investors post on SI. As for DJE.v, I sold 80% on a 5-bagger and just have the remainder in our IRAs along with a dozen yellowcake stocks. The Picenace Basin nat gas story sounds good but I keep reminding myself I also have several other nat gas explorers that have tanked 50-80%. I've heard the guy heading Titan Uranium is well respected in the industry. Hopefully they hit a gusher in the east Athabascha Basin :-)