Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TGPTNDR who wrote (229043)	3/27/2007 4:39:32 PM
From: dougSF30	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

It's on the order of my post of last ?December? indicating my Opinion that Intel had gotten, finally, their 65 Nm CMW production working properly. Well that's silly. CMW overclocked like mad out of the gate, and it was Intel's fastest ramp ever. Production was working from the get go, earlier than expected. that 90 Nm is continuing to use APM gathering data to go beyond, in performance, where 90 Nm was intended to cross over the 65 Nm process. Well, make that 200mm 90nm. I wonder if it something to do also with their transition to 300mm that caused problems. Have they said whether or not the latest 90nm parts (since late last year) are using SiGe?