SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (225311)3/27/2007 7:51:21 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 281500
 
Looks like it's ALL going to be on Bush! Does he veto the bill, and not support the troops?



To: kumar who wrote (225311)3/28/2007 7:17:22 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 281500
 
The Republicans COULD have filibustered and prevent the bill from passing. But, they didn't. They're putting it ALL on their idiot President. Now, HE can "refuse to fund the troops" in his pet war, because the Dems want to follow the will of the people and take his army men away before he leaves office in Jan. '09.

After all, he doesn't have to run for re-election..


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News