SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (103273)3/27/2007 8:27:07 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361353
 
The cost of war: $5,500 per second

Tuesday, 27 March 2007
By BARTHOLOMEW SULLIVAN

The $100 billion Congress authorized to pay for the continuing war in Iraq translates into $5,500 per second through Sept. 30, and could purchase 111 Queen Mary 2 cruise ships at $900 million a piece.

"This war is a grotesque mistake," Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in bringing the debate to a close Friday afternoon. Earlier, Rep. Sam Johnson, R-Texas, received sustained applause when he said, "Frankly we all want our troops home _ when the job is done."

Congress voted 218-212 to authorize spending $100 billion for the war effort and another $24 billion for various "sweeteners," including agricultural subsidies and hurricane relief. The bill sets September 2008 as a date to bring the troops home, a provision President Bush cited in his promise to veto the measure should it reach his desk.

To put the appropriation in perspective, the $100 billion Congress agreed to spend on the Iraq war through Sept. 30 is equivalent to:

* $331.73 for each of the 301,443,094 residents of the U.S.
* 4.6 million times the $21,587 per capita income of the U.S.
* 2.07 million Mercedes Benz SLK350 Roadster automobiles.

The vote came after floor debates that began on Thursday.

"Setting a date certain for withdrawing from Iraq is a dangerous idea," said Rep. Roger Wicker, R-Miss. "Our enemies will simply adjust their tactics and wait us out. The consequences of such a withdrawal will be far-reaching. It would signal defeat for the United States and embolden terrorists in Iraq and around the world; it would enable al Qaeda to establish a beachhead in Iraq from which to operate; and it would be a catastrophe for the people of Iraq and the region."

Rep. John Tanner, D-Tenn., said it will send a message to the Iraqi government that it has to be more effective.

"We have lost more than 3,200 of our best men and women over the last four years and four days we have been in Iraq, and more than 24,000 others have come home wounded," said Tanner. "We are spending about $200,000 a minute in Iraq. The Iraqi people need to know that we will not continue to do all the work if they are unable or unwilling to put aside their religious differences and come together to build a civil society."

capitolhillblue.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (103273)3/27/2007 9:38:15 PM
From: cirrus  Respond to of 361353
 
If the Iraq war had gone as promised and cost only a few billion Bush would have given his base another tax cut.



To: stockman_scott who wrote (103273)3/27/2007 9:38:19 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero  Respond to of 361353
 
If we spent that same dollar amount providing our citizens with the various forms of early cancer screening we would save thousands of lives..........instead we waste the money on killing machines.



To: stockman_scott who wrote (103273)3/27/2007 10:02:39 PM
From: Rock_nj  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361353
 
That is exactly why paranioa about being attacked is misguided. Threats to our existence start at home and cancer is one of them, which we are neglected to address adequately. Sad irony that Tony Snow who has worked as a spokesman for these misguided Republican war mongering polices is now threatened by something that has nothing to do with a foreign enemy. I hope him well, because it does not sound good.