SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John McCarthy who wrote (37146)3/28/2007 2:57:22 PM
From: Mr. Aloha  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78408
 
if the other company paid whatever to CUU ...
could CUU still do their own production and therefore
realize that gold ...


No, if Teck buys back in on the project, they will be partners on whatever comes out of the Schaft Creek project. It would be very nice for CUU to have a major like Teck as a partner, though Teck will likely try to buy CUU out instead, IMO.



To: John McCarthy who wrote (37146)3/28/2007 3:55:52 PM
From: jackjc  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78408
 
John CUU would have 25% ownership and would receive huge profit
assuming decent metals prices, as this would be about a 50,000T/da operation, a real biggie mine.

But Teck would not likely want to be at the table with little CUU long term on this (perhaps 50 yr mine life) project.

So would need to pay what the holders would accept, to own it all.

This back-in is not a negative, Teck is needed to finance and
operate. CUU is providing its expertise in efficiently bringing
the deposit through fease. And Teck can make it happen from there.

When Teck gave this option around 2001 the deposit had zero value at 60 copper,
so CUU was nervy and agressive in even making the deal.
(It was tough raising cash at first, I got it the 20 PP initially).
And deserving of the benefit they are now just beginning to receive.

We have a ways to go yet, or CUU would be much higher IMO.