SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy who wrote (225569)3/29/2007 3:04:59 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
Really? I was under the impression that the final boundary negotiations weren't really ever agreed upon before the whole thing blew up.

No, the boundary negotiations were agreed on, according to Dennis Ross, and Saeb Erekat, the main Pal negotiator. The Pals got 95% of the WB, all of Gaza, plus some land swaps inside Israel to make up 100% of the acreage of the territories.

Arafat blew up the deal over Pal "right of return" to Israel. Barak was willing to do some limited returns (he had already let thousands of Pals in, I don't remember how many), but Arafat insisted on the unlimited right of return of everybody who claimed to be a refugee or the descendent of a refugee. This is a non-starter for Israel.



To: Elroy who wrote (225569)3/29/2007 8:45:51 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
To my knowledge there never has been an official acknowledgement of what the terms were. The % figures for total land are what one hears. However, I have never seen a claim that Israel was prepared to give most of E. Jerusalem, anything remotely like joint ownership of the holy sites, and remove all WB settlements. If in fact Israel was prepared to do this, they lost one hell of a photo-op by not going public with it.