SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly Buy and Sell Set Ups -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chowder who wrote (11767)3/30/2007 3:42:02 AM
From: bumblin bob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13449
 
Thanks! If it wouldn't be too much trouble, I'd like your feedback on my reasoning behind this buy.
A little background: My most successful trades seem to be in the $4-$5 area. The closer to $5 the better. I usually buy new 52 week highs, B/O from consolidation (like BPA) or recoveries after bad news or bad overall market conditions. I'm partial to the under $5 group because of the explosive moves, but the $4-$5 ones have proven more predictable (and therefore more profitable). 10% is my usual target on a trade. Actual profit varies , of course, but 10% is the initial target.
I have convinced myself that the $4-$5 plays are better because once they cross $5 the institutional money is able (allowed) to buy them. They may have thier eye on a company and want to buy it, but because of the price they are not able. Once it hits $5 they are able and jump in. Sort of like an addition to an index that a fund follows. While I have noticed nice gains in the $10, $15 and $20 area, none of them seem as good (consistent) as the $5 area.
I have no concrete evidence that this is the case, nor have I run across anyone explaining it as a strategy, so I may be seeing what I want to see here, but I thought that you might have run across this somewhere in your research or thought about it while trading.
Any thoughts from you or the other posters would be appreciated.