Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (225622)	3/29/2007 9:38:17 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

See my previous comment on the holy sites. I was wrong there. However, in the WB, there remained a bunch of nonsense IMO. Bisecting the WB with a corridor to the Dead Sea, same for some settlement islands, ag land in the Jordan valley, and water control. Plus some long phased swaps (10-25 years??). IMO, no sane leader negotiating to define his countries borders should have accepted such an idiotic border. Shame on Clinton for lacking the cajones to point this out and insist on something approaching rationality. Clinton should have stiffed the Jewish side on the land issue, and stiffed the Pals on the right of return. He just might have gotten a deal.