SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (18488)3/30/2007 9:06:04 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 71588
 
Can the GOP become a national party again?

BY BRENDAN MINITER
Tuesday, March 27, 2007 12:01 a.m. EDT

Remember Christie Todd Whitman?

As recently as four years ago she was held up as a symbol that the Republican Party was moving away from its conservative roots and would maintain national dominance by appealing to moderate, suburban women. Ms. Whitman herself won two terms as governor of New Jersey and was tapped to run the Environmental Protection Agency by George W. Bush. She left government in 2003, published a book called "It's My Party Too" and created a political action committee aimed at establishing her as a moderate anchor for the GOP.

She then precipitously sank into political oblivion as her party sailed on without her. It's not likely she'll make more than a cameo appearance at next year's Republican National Convention or, for that matter, at any other high-profile Republican event. She won't, we can be confident, persuade many voters to follow her lead with whomever she endorses for president. In a few more years, no one will remember who she is or why she was once an important political figure.

Now another former governor of a Mid-Atlantic state, Maryland Republican Robert Ehrlich, is writing a book aimed at influencing the future of his party. His working title is "Not Your Father's Republican Party," and his aim, unlike Ms. Whitman's, isn't to push the GOP into the mushy middle. In a visit to The Wall Street Journal's offices recently, Mr. Ehrlich said he'll offer this advice to his fellow Republicans: Elect a strong leader. Don't shy away from taking on controversial issues, even those involving race. Return to economic and fiscally conservative principles. And "never apologize when you're right."

Will he be more successful than Ms. Whitman? Last year Rudy Giuliani campaigned for him and before Election Day was telling Republicans in other states to emulate Mr. Ehrlich's strategy of winning votes in a heavily Democratic state by forcefully sticking up for conservative principles. Mr. Ehrlich says he'd likely be on a short list of potential vice-presidential candidates, if he hadn't been unseated in November.

Politics is a rough-and-tumble sport, and Mr. Ehrlich is advocating making contact with the other team. But he's also advocating an idea that, like the Yale-Harvard football rivalry, once ran strong in the imagination of the practitioners of the game: that to be nationally competitive, a party has to be regionally balanced. For Republicans this would mean regaining a balance the party has steady let slip away since the 1968 presidential election, when Southern states started to huddle with the GOP, and that hasn't seemed necessary in an era when the last two Republican presidents have come from Texas, when two successive House majority leaders also hailed from the Lone Star State, and when the first Republican speaker of the House in four decades came from Georgia.

Nonetheless, in last year's elections the trend was clearly in favor of Democratic dominance of the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic and Upper Midwest. Republicans were all but wiped out in the Northeast. There is now just one GOP member of the House in all of New England, Rep. Chris Shays of Connecticut. Republicans were turned out en masse in New Hampshire, where Democrats now control both House seats, the governor's mansion and both houses of the state Legislature. Gov. Mitt Romney opted to run for president instead of re-election in Massachusetts, making it all but impossible for the GOP to hold onto his seat. Democrats also won gubernatorial elections in Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania and Maryland. Connecticut's Republican Gov. H. Jodi Rell won her election, but she's now pushing the largest tax increase in recent memory. If another Republican manages to win her post within a generation, it will be a minor political miracle.

Presidential candidates have long detailed proposals on education, economics and national security. Each person running for the White House over the next year will be forced to take a position on Iraq, the Bush tax cuts and funding for embryonic stem cell research. Candidates will be forced to reveal their ideas on school choice, abortion and health care. Sen. Barack Obama over the weekend took a hit among Democratic loyalists for not having a more detailed plan on creating a federally funded, universal health care program. He won't make that mistake again.

But what Mr. Ehrlich is arguing for is a forceful party that competes in all regions of the country by focusing on core conservative principles--tax cuts, low regulation, marriage and the like--to rebuild in Michigan, Ohio, New York, Pennsylvania and even New England. The idea of a need for a regionally balanced party isn't new, of course. Virginian Thomas Jefferson understood the political necessity in running with New Yorker Aaron Burr to unseat, in a close election, incumbent president and Massachusetts native John Adams in 1800. The electoral math today is similarly demanding. President Bush prevailed in 2000 and 2004 by winning Ohio and Florida. Unless Republicans make inroads in other Northern states, in 2008 Hillary Clinton could win the presidency by losing both Ohio and Florida and carrying instead Colorado, Iowa and Missouri.

The X-factor in next year's presidential election is the accelerated presidential primary schedule, which may enable a candidate who might otherwise be sidelined to win his party nomination. New York's legislature recently voted to move the state's presidential primary to "Super Duper Tuesday," Feb. 5 next year. That would send Empire State voters to the polls on the same day that voters in more than a dozen other states, including California, also head to the polls. The calendar may give an edge to Mr. Giuliani or another candidate not beloved by social conservatives.

Last week Mr. Ehrlich joined the presidential fray and endorsed Mr. Giuliani. Whether the former governor is much remembered four years hence will likely now depend on whether the former mayor of New York is an anchor for his party in states where it risks being swept out to sea.

Mr. Miniter is assistant editor of OpinionJournal.com. His column appears Tuesdays.

opinionjournal.com



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (18488)4/23/2007 11:30:50 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 71588
 
Apr 11, 2007 Contact: Press Office
202-646-5188


Judicial Watch Amicus Brief: FBI Search of Congressman Jefferson’s Office Was Constitutional

Speech or Debate Clause Protecting Members of Congress Does Not Apply

(Washington, DC) -- Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in support of a lower court ruling stating that a FBI search of Rep. William Jefferson’s congressional office was constitutional. The FBI searched Rep. Jefferson’s office in Washington, D.C. on May 10, 2006 during the course of its investigation into a bribery scandal involving Jefferson and high tech business deals in Nigeria.

Judicial Watch argues in its brief, filed on April 6, that the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause, which protects members of Congress from “intimidation by the executive and accountability before a possible hostile judiciary,” does not make the search of Jefferson’s office unconstitutional. The Speech or Debate Clause, the brief states, only protects members of Congress conducting legislative actions.

“Congressman Jefferson has failed to demonstrate that the actions under scrutiny by federal law enforcement officials and the records sought by the search warrant fall within the ‘legitimate legislative sphere.’ Consequently, the privileges of the Speech or Debate Clause do not apply here…,” Judicial Watch noted in its brief. “All of the actions allegedly taken by Congressman Jefferson were allegedly for the sole purpose of using his status as a U.S. Congressman to solidify a business venture in which he stood to make millions of dollars. Such actions are anything but official.”

Jefferson is alleged to have accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes to help broker high-tech business deals in Nigeria. According to press reports, he was also caught on tape discussing the deals, while an FBI search of his home uncovered $90,000 in cash stuffed in his freezer. The FBI later searched Jefferson’s office in the Rayburn House Office Building for documents pertaining to the alleged bribery deals.

“The Speech or Debate Clause was not intended to allow members of Congress to conceal corrupt and criminal activity,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Taking a bribe is not part of the legitimate legislative process. The search of Jefferson’s office is in compliance with constitutional law, and neither Representative Jefferson, nor any other member of Congress, is above that law.”

###

Click here (http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2007/RayburnAmicus.pdf) to view the JW amicus Brief

judicialwatch.org