Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (92357)	3/30/2007 3:42:36 PM
From: JeffA	Respond to of 173976

raining can't

To: JBTFD who wrote (92357)	3/30/2007 3:50:41 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 173976

'This is outrageous' "Two months ago, the Senate voted unanimously to confirm one of our most decorated generals, David Petraeus, to take command in Iraq. Gen. Petraeus promised a fundamental overhaul of U.S. strategy — with a new plan that would at last correct the many mistakes we have made in this long and difficult war," Sen. Joe Lieberman writes in USA Today. "Since taking command, Gen. Petraeus has been true to his word. The result? Sectarian violence is down in Baghdad. The radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr has fled. The Mahdi Army, which terrorized Baghdad last year, appears to be splintering. And the Iraqi government — its spine stiffened thanks to our renewed support — is taking the critical steps for political reconciliation," said Mr. Lieberman, Connecticut independent. "Amazingly, however, just at the moment things are at last beginning to look up in Iraq, a narrow majority in Congress has decided that it's time to force our military to retreat. Rather than supporting Gen. Petraeus, they are threatening to strip him of the troops he says he needs and sabotage his strategy. "This is outrageous. The deadline for retreat that Congress wants to impose is both arbitrary and inflexible. American troops would be forced to begin withdrawing regardless of conditions in Iraq, regardless of the recommendations of our military commanders and regardless of what impact a hasty retreat would have on America's security and credibility — in short, regardless of reality."

To: JBTFD who wrote (92357)	3/30/2007 3:53:28 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 173976

Democrat message "If there's one thing the Democrats' budget resolution makes clear, it's that they didn't get the message voters tried to send to Washington last November," Stephen Spruiell writes at National Review Online (www.nationalreview.com). "They're acting as if the American electorate, which voted against the Republicans, meant to say, 'We liked the GOP's incontinent spending and head-in-the-sand approach to entitlements, but we need someone who will do those things and raise our taxes.' "