Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (92524)	4/1/2007 6:34:52 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 173976

Boy that won't make her 'feel good'

To: Bill who wrote (92524)	4/1/2007 7:49:15 PM
From: Peter O'Brien	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

so are the Russell 2000 and the Wilshire 5000 (both higher than in January 2001).

To: Bill who wrote (92524)	4/1/2007 9:28:20 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 173976

Bush has fed big business the bodies of the middleclass. So of course the S+P is fatter. The big corps have also been allowed to ship manufacturing overseas and evade taxes. Plus huge war spending is always good for the market. So stock prices should not be a measuring stick. or at least subtract the new national debt from the value of the S+P. Clinton gave us a great stock market and surpluses too. WHy not go back to that? It made a helluva lot of sense. Bush fixed what didn't need to be fixed, and created a totally unsustainable US economy. And look at the poor dollar down 50% against the Euro. That's because of the deficit spending. BTW, I would short the Bush economy from here on. It's a house of cards.