Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DayTraderKidd who wrote (57108)	4/2/2007 5:46:08 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 90947

But a large part of the war should be taking out radical leaders on the side, without the troops and large military buildups. Identify the radical organizations and take them out quietly.. the ACLU and Democrats would go nuts, they would be having hearings everyday looking for anyone that lies. It would be a major witch hunt

To: DayTraderKidd who wrote (57108)	4/2/2007 5:49:49 PM
From: Ichy Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Yeah our inaction in regards to muslims helped create this problem now but don't you think in 20 years we could say the same thing about china? Same thing over there. They hate us etc.... I personally feel the best way to manage the WOT is with large military action when needed ie... afganistan, maybe parts of Africa. But a large part of the war should be taking out radical leaders on the side, without the troops and large military buildups. Identify the radical organizations and take them out quietly.. I think our inaction in China would be a topic best discussed by the Dalai Lama. I think the continued inaction, and the continued lack of recognition of what has happened, ie. the Armenian Genocide, the Muslims nazi brigades, and the attacks by Muslims in Indonesia, Palestine, Pakistan, India, Sudan, and so many other places, and the complete lack of response to so many Muslim atrocities against the US have led Islamic Radicals to believe that they can attack with impunity. Somehow Americans seem to be far faster to blame the US for these things than the people who attack the US. Frequently Americans blame the war on oil, I think one failing of George Bush's Government is that he has not raised the price of Gasoline in the US to European levels. Or even to Canadian levels. The artificially low price to consumers should be addressed and Americans would quite quickly be demanding that George Bush go to war with someone to bring the price back down. The increase would either bankrupt the US or pay for the war very quickly. If Bill and Hilary Clinton both believed that Saddam had Weapons of Mass Destruction, and they are on record saying so, how is it that George Bush using the same sources of information was supposed to know better?