SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (103783)4/3/2007 10:41:04 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362801
 
Farewell to a melting glacier
Latin America analyst James Painter returns to the Chacaltaya glacier in Bolivia for the first time in 15 years to find it is melting fast.

Ever since my family and I left the high-altitude city of La Paz 15 years ago, I have been mourning the slow death, by melting, of a long-lost friend.

A favourite outing of ours was to pile into our sturdy old jeep, wind our way up a track that only just clung to the mountainside, and finally arrive at the foot of a majestic glacier called Chacaltaya.

Family photos from the time show sunburnt, smiling faces against a backdrop of a long, snow-covered glacier.

Chacaltaya was famous then for being the world's highest ski run at 5,300 metres (17,400 feet). I remember seeing exhausted but exhilarated skiers crashed out on the floor of a nearby ski lodge, gasping for breath.

Dryly-written articles in scientific journals have traced the rapid demise of the glacier as a result of rising temperatures and the El Nino weather phenomenon. Reading them is like picking your way through a long obituary.

After about 18,000 years as a glacier, Chacaltaya has lost 80% of its area in the last 20 years.

It has become an icon of the effects of global warming, and a laboratory for predicting what is to befall other Andean glaciers.

Monitoring

Retracing the journey in 2007 turned out to be somewhat unexpected.

The day we chose to return was perfect for climate change sceptics. A recent heavy snowfall had left the top of the track impassable by jeep, so we had to walk through deep snow.

We keep having to revise downwards our projections of when Chacaltaya is going to disappear completely
Edson Ramirez
The whole mountain was white - hardly the stuff of retreating glaciers. Chacaltaya was certainly living up to its name in Aymara of "cold road".

"Days like this are completely misleading," said Edson Ramirez, a 37-year-old quietly-spoken Bolivian, who is his country's leading expert on glaciers.

"It's the wet season now. The snow will melt quickly and run off the glacier."

Sure enough, a few days later I received by e-mail a photo taken by Ramirez on 1 March of what was left of the glacier. All that could be seen of what was once a 500-metre long glacier are just two separate areas of ice.

Even on the day of our visit, you could see the clear outline of the two patches of glacier under the snow, measuring about 60 by 20 metres. Not far away stood a forlorn ski lift, not used since 1998.

"We keep having to revise downwards our projections of when Chacaltaya is going to disappear completely," said Mr Ramirez, who has been monitoring the glacier since 1995.

"Not long ago we thought it was going to be 2015, now we think it could be this year or next."

Impact feared

Mr Ramirez is not alone in stressing the dramatic acceleration of the glacial melt since the 1980s.

The Bolivian government is certainly taking it seriously.

Back down in La Paz, the head of the national climate change programme, Oscar Paz, said: "These glaciers are our water stores. One of our great concerns is the future of our drinking water supplies."

Chacaltaya may be a symbol of what is happening to small Andean glaciers, but it does not provide the water to La Paz and neighbouring El Alto, home to nearly two million people.

For that you have to travel about an hour down more bone-jarring tracks to the spectacular range of mountains called Tuni Condiriri, named after their appearance like a condor hunched ready to pounce.

A reservoir under the range provides about 80% of the drinking water to El Alto and large parts of La Paz.

Bolivian and international glaciologists are shifting their attention here, in part because of fears over the impact of glacial melt on Bolivia's long-term development.

Various measurements show the area of the 15 original glaciers in the range has reduced by more than a third from 1983 to 2006. Five glaciers may have already disappeared completely.

'Hurt'

The glaciers are particularly important during the dry seasons as they slowly release water.

"We don't know exactly how much of the water supply comes from glacial melt but it could be as much as 60%," says Mr Ramirez.

Most worrying is when the glaciers completely disappear, which Mr Ramirez puts in the range of 2025 to 2050.

Even now Bolivia has a pressing need for more water. The arrival of several thousand migrants from rural areas to El Alto every year means demand for water will increase as the supply remains the same.

Mr Ramirez's model predicts that as early as 2009 there will more demand than water available in the reservoirs.

Many agree that the long-term drop in water from glacial melt exacerbates the urgent necessity to capture more of the precipitations during the wet season, probably by building dams.

Mr Paz clearly thinks it wrong that desperately poor countries like Bolivia should have to pay the cost of adapting to global warming when they are not to blame.

In the meantime, Mr Ramirez and the team I travelled with were coping with the imminent loss of Chacaltaya by resorting to graveyard humour.

"Maybe we should put the last bit of the glacier in a freezer for posterity," they said.

But there was no doubt about their sorrow. "It really hurts," they agreed. "We have had the privilege of seeing their beauty. The next generations will not."

Story from BBC NEWS:
news.bbc.co.uk

Published: 2007/04/03 10:49:56 GMT

© BBC MMVII



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (103783)4/3/2007 10:45:29 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 362801
 
It's a plug-in hybrid – and it's a school bus

Bus manufacturers are already rolling out the environmentally friendly vehicles – years before major automakers say they will.
By Mark Clayton | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

The basic yellow school bus hasn't changed much in 30 years: a shoe-box-on-wheels built to transport kids safely at low cost.

Now Ewan Pritchard wants to turn that soot-spewing school bus into a clean, green plug-in-hybrid machine. High mileage. No more exhaust cloud at each stop.

When Mr. Pritchard, a mechanical engineer, unveiled his plan to a major bus manufacturer in 2002, snickering officials nearly laughed him out of the room. That was before hurricane Katrina hit, and diesel prices skyrocketed.

"When we first talked about this, manufacturers acted as if we were asking them to build flying cars or something," says Pritchard, hybrid program manager for Advanced Energy, a small nonprofit energy-consulting company in Raleigh, N.C.

That laughter has subsided. Now, the nation's biggest school-bus maker has orders for 19 buses from districts in 11 states – including Washington, California, Texas, Iowa, Arkansas, and North Carolina.

In Bradenton, Fla., Manatee School District officials last month became proud owners of the nation's first two plug-in hybrid school buses. Students are catching the spirit of their new ride, too. Emily Mulrine, a district student, helped name her middle school's new plug-in hybrid bus "Limpio," the Spanish word for clean.

Such plug-in hybrid buses use both a diesel engine and an electric motor – plugging into a power socket at night to charge batteries. Environmentalists and energy-security hawks love the idea.

"Buses are a great way to use off-the-shelf technology that can reduce pollution and energy use," says Roland Hwang, senior policy analyst at the Natural Resources Defense Council. "This move creates greater pressure on the automakers to produce similar technology."

Indeed, while big automakers tout plans to build plug-in hybrid cars a few years from now, Navistar International Corp.'s school bus division, IC Corp., is already rolling out plug-in hybrid buses. This week, another one will be delivered in Pennsylvania.

To some, it's nothing less than a role reversal in innovation.

"The school-bus industry is usually 10 to 12 years behind," says Bill Schroyer, director of fleet management for the Florida Department of Education. "It was a surprise to see them do this and jump ahead. From the plug-in standpoint, we're ahead of the auto industry."

It's a big deal to the school-bus industry as well.

"There is a huge shift going on – a seismic shift in mind-set and in technology for us and for schools," says Randall Ray, manager of bus platform marketing for IC Corp., based in Warrenville, Ill. "Plug-in hybrid buses are a very viable system, and we have high expectations for it."

Other efforts to clean up school buses have emerged over the years. Some districts still employ a handful of all-electric or compressed natural-gas buses. Maintenance costs were high for CNG, and range of driving was a problem for electric, analysts say.

Fuel prices and concerns about global warming could increase receptivity to plug-in hybrids. But all agree the cost needs to come way down first.

"There's definitely a lot of interest," says Ryan Gray, senior editor at School Transportation News, a trade publication based in Los Angeles. "Fuel savings holds a lot of weight for people."

Each of the first 19 buses costs over $200,000 – more than double the cost of a regular model. At that price, they won't pay for themselves over their lives, even with superior fuel savings. It's a chicken-and-egg problem because until about 1,000 buses roll off assembly lines, the cost of production will keep prices high.

Even after manufacturing efficiencies and competition bring the price down, plug-in hybrid school buses may still cost $40,000 more than a regular bus. But at that point, they will pay for themselves in just a few years with lower maintenance and fuel costs, analysts say.

Ordinary yellow "type C" school buses get about 6 to 8 miles to the gallon. But the new plug-in hybrid models, rated at more than 12 m.p.g., could cut fuel consumption about in half in many districts. That could mean a big fuel savings for tight budgets.

If the nation could double its fleet miles, school savings could be significant. About 475,000 buses transport 25 million kids each day. Traveling more than 4 billion miles a year, those buses burn about 550 million gallons of fuel annually, Mr. Gray says.

"If we could cut our fuel use in half, boy, we've done something good," says Mr. Schroyer of the Florida Department of Education. "It's that much less pollution, that much less cost."

Electricity isn't free, of course – and using it pollutes, especially in regions where coal-fired power plants predominate. Still, the price and emissions per mile powered by electricity are much less when compared with those of diesel fuel.

"It's definitely worth it to try this," says Ben Matthews, director of school support for the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, which is buying two buses. "What we're buying is a prototype of the school bus of the future."

For Pritchard, the crusade isn't over. He's used up a small grant as seed money to help fund buses now being delivered. Now he's wishing the federal government would toss a few of its millions spent on energy research into deployment of plug-in buses.

"It's still very difficult to get people to fund this effort and buy into the idea," he says. "But in the long run, it's going to work."

www.csmonitor.com | Copyright © 2007 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (103783)4/3/2007 10:51:29 AM
From: SiouxPal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362801
 
Nice segue.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (103783)4/3/2007 10:59:36 AM
From: 10K a day  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 362801
 
Yah and my name is Joe Montana.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (103783)4/3/2007 1:38:25 PM
From: SiouxPal  Respond to of 362801
 
How Will Our Grandchildren See Us?
by Scott Bontz



Thirty years ago, Alex Haley’s “Roots” on television inspired millions to sleuth their blood ties to history. On this anniversary, let’s imagine what our own descendants will make of us when they look back.

What they will see is that Earth’s people more than tripled between 1950 and 2050. They’ll see that halfway through this explosion, American material consumption had grown so voracious that four Earths would be needed for everyone on the planet to live the same way. And they’ll see that billions tried.

They’ll see that this combination exhausted and poisoned water supplies, exterminated hundreds of thousands of species, and plowed under forests and grasslands, eroding essentially irreplaceable soils.

They’ll see that what fueled the “free market” was humanity’s biggest free lunch: We exploited energy accumulated over millions of years — coal, oil and natural gas. And we did it even though we knew we’d run out.

They’ll see that burning these fossil fuels raised temperatures and sea levels to drive tens of millions from coastal cities and drown rich delta soils, turned rich midcontinent farmland into desert, and made storms in wetter regions destructively stronger and erratic.

They’ll see that even during this delayed reaction to the Big Burn, fossil fuels petered out, and with them the irrigation and fertilizer that made it possible to feed so many extra billions.

And they’ll see that before the resulting hardships, people in the richest countries got much fatter, yet no happier.

They — the Children of the Great Depletion — will see that we squandered Earth, their birthright, for the sake of the “good life.”

This portrait in the making, some of it based on climate modeling but most of it already fleshing out in fact, is grim. But we can leave a better picture if we work now to save a planet that’s still in many ways a garden.

This will require us to radically redefine progress and what we mean by “standard of living.” We can’t measure these only with material yardsticks, aiming only for “efficiency” with energy and materials, which just frees capital for more consumption. The goal will be what writer Wendell Berry calls “poorer in luxuries and gadgets, but … richer in meaning and more abundant in real pleasure.” We must make an honest accounting of what our planet can support long term. We must remember that human endeavor is merely a subsidiary of Earth Ltd.

Since the free market has failed us here, we need new rules of taxation, regulation and treaty. So:

Make the American way of life negotiable. Our fuel burning pumps into the atmosphere more global-warming carbon dioxide than any other nation, even though No. 2 China has more than four times as many people. We have to lead the way out.
Do this by taxing fossil fuels to slash release of greenhouse gases. Price these fuels at their true, long-term cost, including illness from pollution and food production lost to climate change. Invest the revenue in sustainable alternatives. Do it soon: Leading NASA climate scientist James Hansen reckons we have a decade at most to start reducing greenhouse gases before drastic climate change becomes inevitable.

End tax exemptions for any more children than two — those predating the rule excepted. Through government subsidy make contraceptives and sterilization surgery free. Even if nothing else about sex is taught in school, explain exponential growth.

Negotiate with other affluent countries to cut consumption. Again, it’s our responsibility to lead.

For poor nations, greatly expand aid, but make it conditional: They must control population and pollution, and protect land, air and water. This investment could be far less than current military spending, yet better for long-term national security.

And for policy and individual conduct in general, recognize that what we call economic growth, running now on so much principal from the natural world, cannot last. Instead of spending like there’s no tomorrow, conserve — make this the United States of Conservation — and pass along a good life to our descendants.

What could make them prouder?

Published on Tuesday, April 3, 2007 by CommonDreams.org