Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taro who wrote (331592)	4/3/2007 5:57:40 PM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 1578158

re: They did that last year as well. And they were wrong. Kind of funny but I haven't seen any big noise in the media for that, for them being all wrong. No "big noise", but the media continually says they were wrong (and explains why). What do you expect, front page headlines across the country "Hurricane Forecasters Wrong in 2006!!!!". re: Now you guess, if by accident they happen to be right this time, what kind of exposure do you expect the media to give that???? Probably less. By the way, most of the hurricane forecast guys are not claiming the increased hurricane activity is caused by GW, especially not Dr. Gray. They are saying it's part of a cycle. SST's are high, La Nina which decreases shear is expected, one wild card is the Sahara winds and their influence. Looks like a bad season, maybe not.