SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Taro who wrote (331689)4/4/2007 11:21:03 AM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 1572657
 
"Is that acceptable?"

Just illustrating how far off base Shorty was. And that is an upper bound, I doubt if a billion bulbs have been sold, much less discarded, and most bulbs have less mercury than that. If the bulbs are recycled, and only about 10% are, then the release is reasonably close to zero.

Is it acceptable? It is lower than the mercury released by a coal-fueled power plant supplying electricity for the equivalent incandescent bulb over the estimated lifespan of the CF bulb. According to the EPA, anthropogenic mercury releases are somewhere between 3k tons/year and 5k tons/year. So the CF bulbs don't represent much of a threat.