Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (331808)	4/4/2007 8:06:27 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1573020

carbon credits forgive your sins from polluting, it's a religion

To: Road Walker who wrote (331808)	4/4/2007 8:20:09 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573020

JF, "carbon credits" are to the global warming zealots what "indulgences" were to the pre-Reformation Catholic Church. Most people are told to accept global warming as fact, even though meteorologists can't even predict the weather one week from now. Hurricanes and unusually hot summers are brought up as proof of global warming, while unusually cold winters and the lack of hurricanes (such as in 2006) are dismissed as "statistical aberrations." We're supposed to cut back on our greenhouse gas emissions or face "judgement day" in the form of castastropic climate change. And anyone who dares to point out the religion of global warming is ridiculed and called a "righty nut case." Just like you did. I don't deny that there is a greenhouse effect, or that six billion people on this earth is bound to shift the equilibrium of the climate. But it's really rich to see those who accuse me of being a hypocrite of being hypocrites themselves. What do you call it JF? Ah yes, "projection." lolololololol Tenchusatsu

To: Road Walker who wrote (331808)	4/4/2007 10:10:20 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573020

Re: 65-50 [John Podhoretz] ( A little right-wing whistling past the graveyard? ) The news that the three top Democrats have outraised the three top Republicans by a total of $15 million is very significant. It indicates that those inclined to give to Democrats are opening their wallets bigtime while Republican donors are profoundly wary. It's an indication of an intensity gap between committed Dems and committed Republicans. This can change — after all, these are only numbers for the first quarter of 2006. An exciting race on the GOP side could cause a lot of money to shake free in the fall and winter, when it will be most needed. But this is yet another data point to suggest there has been a GOP meltdown since 2004 and only a really vibrant GOP campaign leading to a very formidable and stimulating nominee can turn things around. The Downside of Raising a Lot of Money [John Podhoretz] Here's the irony: Any campaign that has raised a colossal amount of money early — and there are six such presidential campaigns — is in danger of falling prey to the temptation to waste it because the money is sitting right there. It will be difficult to resist claims on it by state and local organizations because they know just like everybody else that the bank account is overflowing. It's human nature. The campaigns may not feel the pressure to economize. They may rent office space that's just a little too expensive, hand out a few too many cell phones and computers, hire too many paid workers — the kinds of expenses that add up over time and slowly but surely drain even stuffed coffers. Remember that once a person has given a campaign 2 grand, he's given as much as he can give. That means he's out of the picture from then on. If the campaign spends too many of those 2,000 contributions in April, May and June 2007, they won't find that money all that easy to replace in December and January. corner.nationalreview.com