SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stan who wrote (62066)4/5/2007 2:13:30 PM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 197239
 
Nokia has no more right to unilaterally set a price than the average consumer has a right to walk into a store, take a product off the shelf, and walk out with it after leaving only a fraction of the established price on the counter. Leaving some money on the counter does not make the act any less

Funny, manalagi said something almost exactly similar as that on the other thread.

Message 23432459



To: Stan who wrote (62066)4/5/2007 2:14:35 PM
From: JeffreyHF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197239
 
Re: Arbitration demand

I think this correlates with Qualcomm`s recent statement that there is a disagreement concerning the construction/availability of the infamous "option". If the continued use by Nokia of acknowledged Qualcomm IPR constitutes an implicit exercise of the "option", we have a new, long term contract, folks.



To: Stan who wrote (62066)4/5/2007 2:35:09 PM
From: limtex  Respond to of 197239
 
Stan - After the BRCM performance we have to assume that Q's lawyers are going to be on the button. This presumabl means that there is a valid arbitration clause.

Actually this seems to me to be very good news if it can get a decision within say six-nine months. Lets see if NOK accpets and gets on with it without any delaying tactics. It might just be enough to force the whole universe of claims????

Best,

L