SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: peterk who wrote (62083)4/5/2007 3:19:17 PM
From: JeffreyHF  Respond to of 197252
 
Arbitration should result in a stay of Nokia`s anticipated chipset litigation. That would remove their market disruption leverage. At the same time, it won`t affect our GSM/GPRS/EDGE cases, because Nokia has never licensed those patents outside of multi-mode WCDMA.



To: peterk who wrote (62083)4/5/2007 3:19:26 PM
From: JGoren  Respond to of 197252
 
Yup. The only real advantage of arbitration is speed. (Secondarily, privacy about the terms that are in the contracts.) It's not necessarily cheaper. and, as you point out, it has many disadvantages, including the one you mentioned. Of course, that has not prevented NOK from appealing an arbitration decision. I think the Vitelcom suit was arbitrated and NOK appealed the confirmation order.



To: peterk who wrote (62083)4/5/2007 3:45:10 PM
From: blimfark  Respond to of 197252
 
Peter....what would be the downside IF the arbitration went against QCOM? It would seem to me that a loss in arbitration puts us right where we are today.