Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (16561)	4/6/2007 1:01:44 AM
From: abuelita	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217906

maurice- I guess you are in favour of governments and lawyers running everything. but of course. after all, i am a pinkie commie left leaning liberal socialist canuck hoser of the female persuasion even though i've recently been granted bloke status <vbg> btw, your reply did not disappoint. you are soooo predictable :-) -hoser

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (16561)	4/6/2007 1:38:13 AM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217906

MQ this is a shallow and baseless statement and here's the proof. Man, this guy keeps saying there's a DNA for anything. This pseudo-scientific "proofs" is to satisfy his ego that there's a kind of WASP DNA around... But let’s demolish his shallow theory: "Smokers are more generally the lower socioeconomic group and on average less intelligent than non-smokers and are more generally dependent on taxpayer pensions than the smarter, richer, non-smokers." Smoking habit has been depicted, in Hollywood movies, associated with the bad guy, the poor the loser. (Just watch: the close up to the unshaved lips, the unlit grayish green room). This sublimed perception becomes ingrained in the brain of the person and that person start uttering, that what was planted into his brain, as his own opinion. It is nothing more than counteracting the ads of the 60’s and 70’s of the habit associated with successful good looking people. The sublimar persuation make the guy think that by lighting up, he’d become successful good looking and rich. Disclaimer: I have smoke throughout my life. Two three years. Then stopped 3 to 5 years. Two three years, then stopped. Stopped, completely, after my Experiment was born. MQ, smoking kills old people who do not stop smoking as alcoholism kills people who do not stop drinking. As you age your system can't cope with those chemicals. That's it. If I'd kept smoking and drinking, as in my mid-thirties in Africa I would be a costly burden for the health system. Smoking and drinking while you are young is no problem whatsoever. The problem is that: don't even start: You may not have the strong will power to stop. As my theory proves: MQ is a external-directed man who thinks what is planted in his brain. He doesn’t think by his own. Thus such person is subject to persuation that QCOM is a good investment.