Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (332076)	4/6/2007 5:55:45 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571698

Cuff em Dano. I want to see them in Chains, pelosi in front. So you are calling for her to resign or be impeached ??? I know you are not a hypocrite.

To: combjelly who wrote (332076)	4/6/2007 5:57:58 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571698

Pelosi’s Criminal Acts Posted by AJStrata on April 6th, 2007 strata-sphere.com I am not about to call for Pelosi to be charged or go on trial, but there is a strong case for those who do want to do so. Personally I think it would give too much credibility to her. The WSJ has a good article out on the history of the law that applies and why Pelosi is definitely in violation of the law. opinionjournal.com But consider this statement by Albert Gallatin, the future Secretary of the Treasury under President Thomas Jefferson, who was wary of centralized government: “it would be extremely improper for a member of this House to enter into any correspondence with the French Republic . . . As we are not at war with France, an offence of this kind would not be high treason, yet it would be as criminal an act, as if we were at war.” Indeed, the offense is greater when the usurpation of the president’s constitutional authority is done by a member of the legislature–all the more so by a Speaker of the House–because it violates not just statutory law but constitutes a usurpation of the powers of a separate branch and a breach of the oath of office Ms. Pelosi took to support the Constitution. To best understand this violation picture Cheney establishing “trials” to dispel justice, or having him create a “legislative committee” to create laws. Cheney would be lambasted for these unconstitutional acts. And so should Pelosi. The problem is the fawning Liberal media is not giving her the thrashing she deserves in terms of her usurping of the constitution. So I understand why some may call for her to be charged in order to force the press to face reality and communicate the issue to America. And maybe it will have to be that way. But Pelosi’s screw ups with Isreal and Syria and her alliance with Assad are only the tip of her misteps.