SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (226373)4/7/2007 11:09:12 AM
From: Rambi  Respond to of 281500
 
well, I did the search yesterday, actually, and don't have time now to re-search. How about a compromise? The words I used were "traditional attack" and I believe the question was about what would constitute such, in I's opinion.

So if you genuinely want to know, it's there. Otherwise, I don't understand the game, and will exit at this point.
Have a great day!



To: michael97123 who wrote (226373)4/7/2007 9:17:45 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
If they clearly posted their position, it would enable anyone with a little common sense to blow their position out of the water.

Even if they posted that Iran did attack America, it would come with the standard qualifier of America deserving it.

Therefore, their non answer is their best answer.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News