Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (4864)	4/9/2007 2:38:38 PM
From: roguedolphin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50424

Here is EXACTLY what Silverstien said.....(at approximately 8:22 of the video)...... "maybe the smartest thing to do is PULL IT.....ahhhh....and they made that decision to pull .....and then we watched the building collapse." video.google.com That is exactly what Silverstien said! How the hell else is a 47 story tall steel framed building (WTC7) a city block long supposed to collapse in free-fall after relatively minor fires?????? It must have been rigged with explosives. No other logical explanation....is there??? The twin towers collapsed also........never before in history have steel framed buildings like that collapsed without the use of demolition techniques until 9/11/2001. What does this all mean?? HERE ARE SOME INCREDIBLE 9/11 PICS!! They say a picture is worth a thousand words..... and these pics of the 9/11/2001 disaster are INCREDIBLE!! ALL HERE PLEASE watch the accompanied video clips for specific common demolition techniques!.....and then LOOK AT THE PICTURES!!!!!!! whatreallyhappened.com Rogue