Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MJ who wrote (202029)	4/11/2007 4:41:30 AM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793750

trust.. to have the money men debate is not trust. we are not electing them for office. the candidates explain their positions and defend them in the debates or interviews. they lack trust , because they flip flop depending on money, pressure from organizations with an agenda that can hurt/help them, or polls where the candidates turn on dime from an issue to get more votes. One i remember is ethanol support from government. East coast candidates like kerry, bradley when running for senator were strongly against ethanol support, however, have them run for national office and flip, they are strongly behind ethanol support, i expect they were against farm subsidiaries and flip think helping the farmer at all costs is a great idea. you will have difficulty finding a candidate you can trust completely, only one that you may think you can trust more so than the others. Romney comes to mind right now , his trust ,, is at all time low ,, says he was a hunter , now we find out otherwise. it brings to question how many more statements are in his presentations just to get votes but without any substance.