SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: waitwatchwander who wrote (62360)4/10/2007 9:12:05 PM
From: ohohyodafarted  Respond to of 196963
 
Thank you for posting this. I didn't have time to read very far, but Qualcomm's legal staff presents some very interesting and valid arguments against the adoption of a downstream remedy which BRCM is asking for. Lets hope the ITC view's it the way this paper argues.



To: waitwatchwander who wrote (62360)4/10/2007 9:12:10 PM
From: Brihack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 196963
 
Naked,
Thanks for posting the brief...very interesting reading. I found the following excerpt on page 51 interesting:

"Thus, although Broadcom has touted since the beginning of this investigation that it is poised to begin supplying baseband processing chips for handsets operating on WCDMA networks in the U.S., the plain fact is that Broadcom has not yet garnered even a single design win for a U.S. WCDMA handset. Of the remaining [14] GSM chip manufacturers, none are positioned to supply the WCDMA handset manufacturers with the required baseband chips. For example, Qualcomm understands that Texas Instruments does not yet have a candidate chip design reduced to silicon, and it has no design wins for any WCDMA handset for use in the U.S. Nokia has a proprietary chip design for use solely in its own phones that is fabricated for it by Texas Instruments, but that handset is not yet available for us on a WCDMA network in the U.S."

Brihack