SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raglanroadie who wrote (62463)4/12/2007 6:29:52 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 196952
 
Another good point: <Why can't Q simply state that in order to break in to the market they under priced the CDMA standard at 5% in order to gain traction and that 5% on WCDMA in no way reflects upon CDMA2000? > The array of arguments on QUALCOMM's side seems to me so substantial that it seems silly that Nokia's incoherent arguments are not simply laughed out of court and out of the media.

Mqurice



To: Raglanroadie who wrote (62463)4/12/2007 12:56:57 PM
From: JGoren  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 196952
 
Just because Qcom under priced in 2001, doesn't justify overpricing now is the retort. If we believe that royalties should be negotiated and fairness is determined by the market, then the 2001 license was fair. That raises the question of what factors go into determining fair price. Qcom settled for less because it wanted a toe hold in a market, needed to develop the market back in 2001. Well, how does that translate into today's environment?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News